Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Cleveland, T G and Fashokun, A (2006) Construction-Associated Solids Loads with a Temporary Sediment Control BMP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1122–5.

Doğan, S Z, Arditi, D and Günaydın, H M (2006) Determining Attribute Weights in a CBR Model for Early Cost Prediction of Structural Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1092–8.

Kassab, M, Hipel, K and Hegazy, T (2006) Conflict Resolution in Construction Disputes Using the Graph Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1043–52.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction management; Dispute resolution; Conflict; Decision support systems; Computer applications;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:10(1043)
  • Abstract:
    A formal approach is presented for systematically resolving construction conflicts. Using an actual case study, a decision support system based on the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR II), is employed to effectively investigate the strategic interactions that took place between an owner and a general contractor concerning the financing of a construction project. The conflict analysis process considers the decision participants, their decision options, and their relative preferences when modeling the dispute. GMCR II is then used to perform an in-depth stability analysis in order to ascertain the possible compromise resolutions or equilibria. In the case study, GMCR II correctly predicts the sequence of decisions that took place in the dispute and furnishes an array of useful strategic insights about the conflict. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is executed to determine how changes in preferences can affect the equilibrium results. This conflict resolution procedure is useful for both researchers and practitioners to better deal with the dispute-prone nature of the construction industry.

Lapinski, A R, Horman, M J and Riley, D R (2006) Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1083–91.

Na, L J, Ofori, G and Park, M (2006) Stimulating Construction Innovation in Singapore through the National System of Innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1069–82.

Perng, Y, Juan, Y and Chien, S (2006) Exploring the Bidding Situation for Economically Most Advantageous Tender Projects Using a Bidding Game. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1037–42.

Spielholz, P, Davis, G and Griffith, J (2006) Physical Risk Factors and Controls for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Trades. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1059–68.

Srour, I M, Haas, C T and Borcherding, J D (2006) What Does the Construction Industry Value in Its Workers?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1053–8.

Tang, C M, Leung, A Y and Lam, K C (2006) Entropy Application to Improve Construction Finance Decisions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1099–113.

Yiu, T W, Cheung, S O and Mok, F M (2006) Logistic Likelihood Analysis of Mediation Outcomes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1026–36.

Yu, J, Lee, H and Kim, W (2006) Evaluation Model for Information Systems Benefits in Construction Management Processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), 1114–21.